Congress to consider national BPA ban
Congressional leaders have introduced a bill to ban bisphenol A in all food and beverage containers, capping weeks of milestones for the movement to ban BPA.
The bill is a big step forward and goes further than some bans being proposed by counties, cities and states, many of which are limited to getting BPA out of products intended for children under the age of 4.
Bills were introduced in both the House and the Senate and are being sponsored by Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Baby bottles have been epicenter of the BPA controversy. A lot of progress has already been made in getting BPA out of baby bottles.
Retailers like Babies “R” Us and Target no longer sell baby bottles containing BPA, six major baby bottle makers announced last week that they would no longer produce bottles with BPA and chemical manufacturer Sunoco announced last week that it would no longer sell BPA to manufacturers unless they could guarantee the chemical wasn’t going into products for babies and toddlers.
“The scientific evidence is mounting that BPA poses serious health risks, especially to children, and manufacturers and retailers have already started to pull items from their store shelves,” said Rep. Markey. “It is time for Congress to act quickly to ban this toxin from all food and beverage containers so that parents can feed their children without worrying that the food contains poisonous chemicals.”
All of this progress has been made with no help from the Food and Drug Administration, which still maintains that BPA exposure is safe after studying the issue by relying exclusively on scientific studies funded by the chemical industry.
But BPA affects the health of people of all ages and is found in a vast array of common products. Soda cans and food cans are lined with BPA. Polycarbonate water bottles are made of BPA. The toxic chemical is found in plastic food wrap and plastic food storage containers.
The law protects the possibility of stricter state action to regulate BPA in food and beverage containers, plus any additional state action to regulate BPA in other product categories. Many states are in the midst of advancing their own BPA bans.







Comments on this post
Posted by Margie on Mar. 16, 2009
Be sure to check out the comments made by Senator Diane Feinstein when she introduced the bill. Read the full remarks here: http://cli.gs/X35DHD
Below is a selection:
"There is a great deal wrong with the regulatory system in this country and the way we address dangerous chemicals. Our system is essentially backwards. Chemicals are added to products before we know much about them. To be removed from the market, a chemical must be proven to be exceedingly dangerous.
That means that while we wait for evidence of harm to develop, our children are using dangerous products, and possibly eating contaminated food.
I believe it should be the reverse. We should follow the lead of the European Union, and Canada, and remove chemicals until we know them to be safe. We should not be waiting for proof of danger, which too often comes in the form of birth defects, cancer, and other irreversible health harms."
Posted by matthew wilcenski on Mar. 21, 2009
I support what the Senators are doing to ban baby bottles with BPA that would harm adults that will later on affect their lives and give them a bad learning disability. The staff at LDA supports you to to make sure that BPA will be banned forever.
Thank you
Matthew Wilcenski Board Member of LDANYS
Post a comment